Header Image - Warren Truss

Category Archives

8 Articles

Court of Appeals Upholds Lower Court’s Decision to Deny Emergency Appropriation of Funds for Border Walls

by Brennan Bobbie

The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals handed down a ruling that upholds a lower court’s decision to deny the Trump administration the right to appropriate funds outside of Congressional approval. The appeal to reverse the lower court’s stay order was put forward by the Justice Department, on behalf of the Trump administration. That way, the latter can move forward in a supposed emergency need to reinforce the border walls located in Arizona, California, and New Mexico for security reasons.

The 3-judge panel of the Appeals Court though was not unanimous in arriving at the decision. Judge N. Randy Smith, an appointee of President George W. Bush, disagreed saying that a ruling in favor of the plaintiffs, the Southern Border Communities Coalition and the American Civil Liberties Union, is an approach that is contradictory to the basic fundamentals of judicial review. His opinion is that the majority of the panel members created a constitutional issue where none had existed. Mainly because the complainants who obtained the injunction, have no right to take part in what is actually a dispute between the U.S. president and Congress.

The dispute refers to Donald Trump’s insistence on spending as much as $8 billion for the construction and reinforcement of the U.S.-Mexico border walls, an amount that exceeded the $1.375 billion approved by Congress for border barriers. Congress denied his initial request for a $5.7 billion budget for wall-building this fiscal year, Trump’s insistence and disapproval of the national budget for the fiscal year led to a 5-week, partial shutdown of government offices and agencies.

Although Trump later relented by finally approving the national budget in order to lift the shutdown, he pursued the matter by calling a state of national emergency. In doing so, he gained the executive power to appropriate the budgets of other departments for the perceived emergency purpose of enhancing the security of the country via the border walls.

How the 9th District Court of Appeals Ruled

The two other members of the 3-judge panel, Judge Richard Clifton and Judge Michelle Friedland, wrote in a 75-page order that president Trump’s attempt to transfer Defense Department construction funds amounting to $2.5 billion in order to pursue and build the border wall project beyond what was appropriated by Congress, appeared as a clear violation of federal laww.

The Constitution delegates to Congress, the power to make decisions on how the government is to spend taxpayers’ money. More so where Congress added language that specifically states flexibility of budget does not include use for purposes previously denied by lawmakers. Judge Clifton and Friedland explained that

“Congress did not appropriate money to build the border walls Defendants (the Trump administration) seek to build here. Presumably, Congress decided such construction at this time was not in the public interest. It is not for us (the judicial branch) to reach a different conclusion.”

Moreover, Judges Clifton and Friedland cited the likelihood of the Trump administration’s violation of Appropriations Clause of the Constitution, which disallows drawing from the Treasury for purposes other that those appropriated by law.— the latter being the national budget that he initially refused to approve.

Nancy Pelosi Partake In a Turmoil Of Words Over Probable Impeachment

by Radim Sabryna

Pelosi claimed that Trump was attempting to intentionally mix up talk of impeachment to enable his core voter-base

Democratic congressional head Nancy Pelosi stated Donald Trump is furious that her party is not speeding up to impeach him, as the bond was to new lows with the competitors trading primitive personal barbs.

It was two days straight of a quite open war of words involving Trump and the speaker of the House of Reps, who previously questioned the president’s psychological capacity for office and depicted hope that those close to Trump would step up an involvement “for the good of the nation.”

Trump replied by naming Pelosi “crazy Nancy,” in what seemed to be the first time he related a contemptuous nickname to the lady who is his congressional enemy.

“The White House is just desperate for impeachment’ – Trump is “upset” that the Democrats are keeping off, for now, Pelosi mentioned, even as they heighten congressional inspections into the president’s connection to Russia and his accusations of obstruction of justice — a quest that Trump is attempting to block.

Being forced from the congressional inquest, the president directed the US intelligence group to “completely cooperate” with an investigation into what he has called “spying” on his 2016.

He has even referred to the probe as “treason” and pointed out that he would like to view criminal charges added against his investigators. Pelosi, who repeated her allegations that Trump was involved in a “cover-up,” proclaiming that she was praying for him and that she wanted “his family, as well as his staff or his government, would have an intervention for the good of the country.” – Trump reacted with demeaning allegations, branding her “crazy Nancy” and contemplating about her mental fitness.

Just as quickly as their attack on each other, many citizens are raising eyebrows on the issue. Checking news sites over the internet, relying on WordPress Speed Performance to provide the latest news site that speaks of the issue.

Nancy Pelosi’s Response 

Not The Good Looks But The Politicians’ Charisma

by Camilla Denver

Politicians are always being labeled. The picture they present and represent is vital to winning elections. A politician’s work program is at times making decisions, and filled with debates conversations.By  the way they talk and the way they dress, you can already tell who and what they are. That is charisma.

Charisma has been a characteristic that men and women have. When you own it, it’s not something which could be held in your hand nor does it have a definitive explanation, however, people appear to feel it.

A politician can communicate with individuals on a level that is higher. They can communicate their views and convince people that their opinion is what the individual ought to follow. This is the skill many politicians must own.

A recent research has determined that appeal is not inborn, it’s also a characteristic. Odds are higher that he or she will have more votes when a politician gets charisma.

Charisma isn’t about sex appeal, beauty and allure that is physical. It is not on the most effective lightening creams you use to appear more attractive. Having the ability to create emotion is an attribute of an individual that is charismatic.

A person has emotions of their own, and they have the ability to challenge people and influence people. If a politician is trying to enhance his picture, this undertaking will be assisted with by adding allure. Whenever you’re well dressed, confidence projects you as professional. Confidence is another attribute of an individual who is charismatic. A voice that is powerful and a firm handshake project positivity and being real . Creating eye contact and smiling endeavor power. These are just some of what politicians learned and have to be learn before becoming a public worker.

Most importantly, it’s necessary that you’re honest for everybody. It’s simple to clarify what your vision is in easy terms whenever you have charisma. You may inspire the people around you. Be genuine enough but also consider using a sense of humor because it will make any politician more easy to speak to. People will listen if a politician appears approachable.

Scroll Up